Re: Invalid Characters in URLs
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: >> And slowly things fall apart. >> That is exactly the phenomenon that is called “Protocol Decay” in RFC 9413. I don't think that's quite...
View ArticleRe: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis
Josh Cohen and I are considering publishing a new draft on Subscriptions in HTTP, and as we think through the big design decisions, I ran across this excellent question from Watson Ladd bringing up...
View ArticleRe: Review of draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-00
Martin, thank you for engaging! It's valuable getting input on data synchronization from the author of Designing Data-Intensive Applications...
View ArticleI-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-secondary-server-certs-01.txt
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-secondary-server-certs-01.txt is now available. It is a work item of the HTTP (HTTPBIS) WG of the IETF. Title: Secondary Certificate Authentication of HTTP Servers...
View Article[Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8138)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110, "HTTP Semantics". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8138...
View ArticleFwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt
Hello folks, Tommy Pauly, Martin Thomson, and I have submitted a new I-D, titled “Incremental HTTP Messages.” The draft can be found at the following locations, but please let me introduce the draft....
View ArticleRe: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-00.txt
After Vancouver, I had a conversation with Lisa Dussealt, author of RFC4918, HTTP Extensions for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV), and CalDAV, and asked if she might make herself...
View ArticleRe: 103 Early Hints
Hi Lucas, 2024年9月26日(木) 3:17 Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>: > Hey Glenn >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024, at 03:44, Glenn Strauss wrote: >> Lucas wrote: >> There was also...
View ArticleCompression dictionary support - now live in Chrome 130
Thank you all for your help in refining the compression dictionary spec. Chrome 130 released to stable with support for the latest draft (ungated - no longer an experiment). Both Brotli and ZStandard...
View ArticleWRAP_UP Capsule
Hi HTTP enthusiasts, Thanks again for the good discussion at IETF 120 about the WRAP_UP capsule. Since then, Lucas Pardue has joined me as co-author on this document, and rewrote the explanation text...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on draft "The HTTP QUERY Method"
I want to comment on https://httpwg.org/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body.html, section 1. Introduction: As an alternative to using GET, many implementations make use of the HTTP...
View ArticleWorking Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-02
Hello HTTP, This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-02. This draft is stable at this point, and doesn’t have any open issues. You can find the draft here:...
View ArticleI-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt
Internet-Draft draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt is now available. It is a work item of the HTTP (HTTPBIS) WG of the IETF. Title: The IP Geolocation HTTP Client Hint Authors: Tommy Pauly David...
View ArticleI-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-06.txt
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-06.txt is now available. It is a work item of the HTTP (HTTPBIS) WG of the IETF. Title: The HTTP QUERY Method Authors: Julian Reschke Ashok...
View ArticleI-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-05.txt
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-05.txt is now available. It is a work item of the HTTP (HTTPBIS) WG of the IETF. Title: Resumable Uploads for HTTP Authors: Marius Kleidl Guoye Zhang...
View ArticleI-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-06.txt
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-06.txt is now available. It is a work item of the HTTP (HTTPBIS) WG of the IETF. Title: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Author: Benjamin M....
View ArticleI-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-01.txt
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-01.txt is now available. It is a work item of the HTTP (HTTPBIS) WG of the IETF. Title: Security Considerations for Optimistic Protocol Transitions...
View ArticleFwd: New Version Notification for draft-joshco-symmetric-h2-01.txt
I've published an ID describing an HTTP/2 extension for Symmetric HTTP. The draft draws wisdom and inspiration from Cory Benfields draft-benfield-http2-p2p-02. Symmetric HTTP makes a simplifying...
View ArticleRe: [Webtransport] [Masque] Endpoint requirements for unknown Capsules
Hi Folks, Reviving this thread because the last couple of weeks I spotted a new gotcha with capsule extensibility - use of error codes. It turns out in RFC 9297 we only formally registed...
View Article[Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8154)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110, "HTTP Semantics". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8154...
View ArticleDRAFT agenda for IETF 121, Dublin
... is at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/121/materials/agenda-121-httpbis Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
View Article[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9530 (8158)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9530, "Digest Fields". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8158...
View ArticleHow big can the protocol elements in HTTP be?
I'm in the process of writing yet another implementation of RFC 9292 (this time with incremental decoding) and I realized that in this setting I need to start caring about size limits in a more...
View ArticleRe: Please review HTTP performance aspects of Incremental Font Transfer
On 2024-07-24 18:25, Chris Lilley wrote: >> On 2024-07-24 20:02, Patrick Meenan wrote: >> I filed an issue but the one part that looked like it might be able >> to use some more...
View ArticleHttpdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis-07
Reviewer: Lucas Pardue Review result: Not Ready I reviewed draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis-07 on behalf of the HTTP directorate. Summary This document combines two past documents, RFC 6712 and RFC 9480,...
View ArticleFwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt
Hey all, we made progress on HTTP Resource Versioning, and published a new draft -02 last Monday. In particular, Mark Nottingham and Lisa Dusseault asked how the *Version:* and *Parents:* headers...
View Article[Errata Verified] RFC9530 (8158)
The following errata report has been verified for RFC9530, "Digest Fields". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8158...
View Article[Errata Verified] RFC9421 (8103)
The following errata report has been verified for RFC9421, "HTTP Message Signatures". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at:...
View Article[Errata Verified] RFC9421 (8102)
The following errata report has been verified for RFC9421, "HTTP Message Signatures". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at:...
View Article[Errata Rejected] RFC9110 (8138)
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC9110, "HTTP Semantics". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8138...
View ArticleDelete-Cookie header??
Hey folks!! A few months back, I suggested <https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-clear-site-data/issues/82> adding a granular way to delete cookies on the WebAppSec Clear-Site-Data repo, and folks...
View ArticleNomcom feedback
Hi all, Reminder that NomCom is waiting for feedback on leadership positions at the IETF, including IESG and IAB. If you haven’t done so, please go to:...
View ArticleHTTP WG meeting Dublin now...
As datatracker might be down; visit: https://meetecho.ietf.org/client/?session=33411 Best regards, Julian
View ArticleIETF 121 Meeting Info
For those having trouble getting into the meeting due to datatracker issues, you can get into meet echo here:...
View Articleresumable uploads vs multiple 1xx responses vs Java clients
Hi, I just updated https://github.com/greenbytes/java-http-1xx-tests with tests for this scenario. Of the tested Java clients that support 1xx, only one (OkHttp) currently fails (and I expect that to...
View ArticleNew draft: HTTP Version Translation of the Capsule Protocol
Hi HTTPBIS Last year, Kazuho asked us to consider whether an intermediary can translate unrecognized HTTP Upgrade Tokens across HTTP versions [1]. The discussion concluded that this is not possible:...
View Articleresumable uploads
Hi, I think I've left this feedback before, but I'll reiterate. I think this approach is correct. This is what you need to do to get a big photo or video off of a cell phone. The name of the draft...
View ArticleAdditional topic for Thursday: AD-requested feedback
Hi folks, Our AD has an outstanding DISCUSS on this document, due to HTTP-related concerns: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server/ We'd like to spend a little time at...
View ArticleQuestion about the "One Round-Trip Reauthentication" for HTTP SCRAM (RFC 7804)
Hi, I have a question about the "One Round-Trip Reauthentication" for HTTP SCRAM (RFC 7804) and I am assuming that this is now the right venue to ask questions about this HTTP authentication scheme....
View ArticleIs "*/xml" a valid value for the Accept field
Hi there, while working on "Accept-Query" I came across this: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#field.accept>> Accept = #( media-range [ weight ] ) >> media-range = ( "*/*"...
View Articletoday's meeting
Would it be possible to have a short discussion on the HTTP workshop for those of us who are not attending? That could include the agenda of topics that will be discussed, and what kind of reportback...
View Article